The Guardian of the Threshold

Dedicated to the Defenders of Arya-Shahr:

May Obedience conquer disobedience within this house

May peace triumph over discord here

generous giving over avarice

reverence over contempt

truthful speech over lying utterance

May Righteous Order gain its victory over the demon of the lie

- Yasna LX, 5

 

Prologue: The Little Drummer Boys[1]

(Natostan Preliminaries)

This essay addresses the xenopolitics of the slowly widening conflict between the satano-globalist West and the anti-globalist Rest, i.e. the politics of discerning and dealing with what is quintessentially alien. More specifically, it points to the necessity of politically defining as ‘alien’ those who choose to become so by the act of betraying their country and their nation. In the author’s considered opinion, this point is a matter of urgency for the Multipolarity and Eurasian Movements, well-illustrated by the recent overthrow of the Assad government in formerly Axis-of-Resistance-aligned Syria and by the follow-up attempt to topple the Islamic Republican government of BRICS member Iran. In both cases, traitors played a significant role. But before addressing the issue of treason in the Eurasian East and the Global South, where it primarily affects specific social groups, without necessarily implicating countries’ governments and state policies, the author wishes to say a few words about the issue of treason in the globalist-ruled West, where it primarily affects countries’ leadership.

As these words are being written, the author’s home city of The Hague is hosting the 2025 NATO Summit, expecting to host 45 heads of state, joined by their defence and foreign ministers and a 6.000-strong contingent of staffers, bureaucrats and bodyguards - not to speak of a multiple number of foreign journalists, commentators and analysts and, stretching the Netherlands’ considerable logistical capacity to its limits, an even larger number of domestic service and security personnel. At an estimated cost of over 183 million Euros (an unsurprising amount given the Dutch’ habit of factoring in maximally profitable ‘overhead costs’), this event, which is supposed to create a ‘stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance’ (quite a challenge on all three fronts despite the recent and considerable ‘achievements’ on the third), is effectively imposing a lockdown across large parts of the ‘international law capital of the world’, now adding a tangible dimension to the police state reality that already characterizes the Netherlands in the bureaucratic, media and digital space for many years. In a major effort at ‘Israelization’, the ‘World Forum’ hosting space has been transformed into a fortress complete with missile defences and concrete road blocks, the national airport and the train stations have been saturated with surveillance equipment and armed personnel, the main access roads have been cordoned off, pedestrian spaces are crawling with uniformed and ununiformed police and a fleet of police cars is patrolling the nooks and crannies of the city while large black helicopters are hovering in the sky. For months now, major road works, traffic changes and security checks have been enforced and, during the preceding week, the homeless have been removed, random body searches have commenced and emergency broadcast systems have been tested. Now, post services have been suspended, supermarkets have been stocked in advance, public services have been reduced to a minimum and non-residents have been advised to avoid The Hague for the duration of the summit, scheduled to be attended by the kind of VIPs that warrant a security clamp-down of Tel Avivian proportions - even if, these days, TA itself seems to be somewhat less ‘immune to disruption’ than it used to be.

Perhaps all these measures are not entirely superfluous: perhaps the leaders of the Free West are right to be somewhat less confident in interactions with the ‘common people’ than they used to be. Perhaps, the last Great Reset years have somewhat soured the ‘public mood’: perhaps, these leaders fear the cumulative effect of the ‘lockdown’-enforced bankruptcy of small business, the ‘BLM’-enforced repression of European identity, the ‘Biden election’-enforced end to voter trust, the ‘vaccine’-enforced ‘died suddenly’ wave, the ‘Ukraine’-enforced neo-Weimarian price inflation and the ‘Gaza’-enforced habituation to televised genocide. Perhaps, they did not quite manage to silence the voices of the dead to the extent that they managed to silences the voices of the living: perhaps, the millions of died-suddenly vaccinees, KIA Ukrainians, collateral-damage Russians, burnt-alive Gazans, knife-attacked tourists, suicided gangrape victims, car-accident whistleblowers and disappeared dissidents retain a presence in the spectral realm that they vainly seek to block out by building walls in The Hague. Perhaps, despite their over-the-top precautions and their debonair demeanour, leaders like Keir ‘Grooming Gang’ Starmer, Emmanuel ‘Nuclear Napoleon’ Macron, Friedrich ‘Blackrock Boy’ Merz and Mark ‘Tefal Pinocchio’ Rutte[2] are less comfortable in their 5-star hotels and their private planes than the self-amputation of their consciences suggests: perhaps, the few pictures of vaunted ‘Fortress Zion’, burning and disintegrating in the fiery realization of Operation True Promise III, that slip through the cracks of censorship haunt them, reminding that denying God and His commandments does not exempt anybody from the laws of karma. Perhaps, the great lockdown of The Hague, preceding their Belshazzar Feast in the great halls of the ‘international law capital of the world’, betrays fear: perhaps, they see some spectral writing on the wall, unwritten by any human hand. For now, however, the truth should also be written by human hand. Here it is: they are right to fear the future, for they are traitors. They may think of themselves as noble ‘Little Drummer Boys’, serving a ‘higher cause’ which just happens to conveniently withhold kompromat and to generously promote careers, but no amount of cognitive dissonance and clever spin doctoring can disguise the fact that they have betrayed not only their countries and their peoples but also their humanity. They have crossed too many lines - they have put themselves beyond the pale. Now, they are not only liable to xenopolitical action, i.e. to be judged and treated as stateless pirates by some future international tribunal, but also to divine retribution.

מנא מנא תקל ופרסין

 

Ephialtes’ Spectre

(Antephialtic Analyses)

 

A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious

But it cannot survive treason from within

An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly

But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely

his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself

- (These Being the Words of) Marcus Tullius Cicero

 

An important aspect of the geopolitical predicament facing the Eurasian East and the Global South, now facing a head-on onslaught by the Neo-Atlantean West on two fronts since the outbreak of the Zion-Persia War on Friday the Thirteenth, 2025, tends to be overlooked by their leaders, viz. a ‘hybrid human’ element that links the two opposing camps and that affects the struggle between them in many unexpected way. Subject to ‘politically correct’ taboo in the West and ‘blind spot’ sentimentality in the East and South, this heterogeneous element tends to go overlooked as a key feature of the post-modern geopolitical landscape, much to the advantage of those who have deliberately created it over the last six decades, viz. the globalist-nihilist hostile elite ruling the West. Here, for convenience, this element, viz. the rapidly expanding demographic category of ‘expatriate communities’ uprooted from the East and South and replanted in the West, will be referred to as Homo Aeroporticus, a term that refers to the nexus of its multi-layered passports, allegiances and interests and which symbolizes the ‘permanent transient’ identity that predetermines its ‘permanent revolutionary’ potential.

Although its oldest strata may be traced back to the tragic human debris of the Western colonial empires, which had already started crumbling in the wake of WWI, a convenient date for the origins the Homo Aeroporticus class as a deliberately bred and expanded ‘political subject’ can be found in the American Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which marks the gradual opening up of the ‘First World’ West to mass migration from the then ‘Third World’ South. Even as America started importing large numbers of low-skill workers from Latin America, useful to drive up prices and press down workers’ rights domestically, and lesser numbers of political refugees from the ‘Second World’, useful to propagate the anti-socialist ‘freedom and democracy’ narrative, Western Europe started similarly accelerating its resettlement of ‘ex-colonials’ and its import of ‘guest workers’, justified by a subtle and cynical combination of sincere-but-exploitable humanitarian considerations and fictitious-but-profitable economic imperatives. The fact that the subsequent growth of the resultant ‘ethnic minorities’ within Western world, largely made up of ethnically, religiously and linguistically unaffiliated population, can be explained on multiple levels, ranging from the unseen psycho-historical ‘post-traumatic stress syndrome’ of the European nations defeated in WWII, across the opaque ‘Kalergi Plan’ of their self-hating soixante-huitard elites, to the crystal-clear sociological shift of their demoralized populations from organic nations to atomized individuals during Les Trente Glorieuses, resulting in an incoherent amalgam of a defeatist Camps des Saints intelligentsia, a cynical comprador bourgeoisie, a dumbed-down hedonistic precariat and a sociopathic gangster underclass.[3] Whatever the explanation, the short- and mid-term political effect remains the same: the import of large numbers of non-Westerners had the overall effect (i.e. not within each subsection but on the whole) of creating a new political subject, viz. a slave class in all the classic senses of the word: economically (cheap labour, consumer demand), socially (sexual access, status positioning) and politically (counterweight to indigenous ‘free men’, support for globalist ruling elite). Presently, after decades of political subterfuge and narrative spin, the effects of the mass immigration on the West have become too obvious to hide and they all line up with the full-spectrum effects of the various colonization projects that cultural anthropologists studied among non-Western peoples during the 20^th Century: habitat loss (non-native urban majorities and ethnic no-go zones), failing reproduction (sub-replacement birthrates and anti-natalist policies), legal discrimination (affirmative action and hate speech laws), physical victimization (violent crime and sexual exploitation), self-destructive behaviour (drugs, obesity and self-mutilation epidemics) and cultural dispossession (closure of religious shrines, removal of public-space monuments and linguistic creolization). But even if the creation of this new slave class is now reluctantly but widely recognized in its domestic effects, i.e. in the effects of the globalist ‘reverse colonization’ project on the native peoples of the West, this is not yet the case in its international effects, i.e. in the effects that it has on the peoples of the Eurasian East and Global South.

A key to understanding the ‘blowback’ of the globalist-engineered colonization of the lands of the West by the peoples of the East and the South is found in the term Homo Aeroporticus: its points to the exponential rise in ‘global interconnectivity’ between lands and peoples that were previously physically separated from each other by geography and history. Less than a century ago, in many instances less, travel between and across continents was still a long, difficult and even hazardous undertaking. Less than half a century ago, in some instances less, travel across most borders was still a relatively rare, exclusive and even adventurous undertaking that was meticulously prepared for by saving a lot of money, going through intimidating bureaucratic processes and doing an extensive study of travel and language guides. Less than a quarter century ago, real knowledge of and direct contact with far-away lands and peoples, even if already facilitated by cheaper air travel and lowered visa requirements, was still characterized by slow book studies and expensive telephone calls. With near-ubiquitous access to the ‘world wide web’ for ‘free’ information, digital phone ‘apps’ for ‘free’ communication, ‘asylum’ facilities for aspiring ‘migrants’ and ‘low cost carriers’ for near-free transport, however, there are no longer any substantial barriers to the near-global proliferation of Homo Aeroporticus as a sub-species - and as a mind-set. Eurasian Easterners and Global Southerners may, with few real impediments, opt to settle in the West, take a second (or third, or fourth) citizenship, bring over friends and family, set up international networks and business and commute between countries - wherever greed, lust and vanity take them. Elsewhere, the author has pointed to how this unprecedented ‘global interconnectivity’ and the equally unprecedented existential condition of Homo Aeroporticus are functions of the ‘three A’s’ revolution: how Airplane, Automobile and Air-conditioning are shaped by and shape the fluid and fatuous life of post-modern ‘last man’, which may have been a condition that arose first in the West but that is now rapidly encroaching the Rest.[4] In this sense, the multitudes of ‘migrant’ Easterners and Southerners that first ‘settled’ in the West and now commute between their former homelands and countless ‘elsewheres’, are successfully ‘assimilating’ to the Homo Aeroporticus ‘role-model’ of the Western life that they aspired to. Given the bureaucratic ease and material benefits that come with ‘dual citizenship’, it may be argued that they are more successful versions of that role-model than native Westerners, who tend to refrain from taking up primary residence and secondary citizenship outside their Western comfort zone. Conducting ‘borderless business’ (more profitably of the grey and black varieties), creating ‘borderless families’ (by unlimited imports of brides and clansmen), and pursuing ‘borderless pleasure’, (following the prompts of ‘Insta’ imaging, ‘Airbnb’ availability and ‘Tinder’ attraction), Homo Aeroporticus becomes rootless, relating to every fixed reality, every rooted person and every authentic reality as a true alien. Irrespective of how many passports he holds, how many second homes he owns and how many off-shore bank accounts he opens, Homo Aeroporticus is essentially homeless. Somewhere becomes everywhere - and everywhere becomes nowhere.

 

No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one, and love the other

or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other

Ye cannot serve God and mammon

- Matthew 6:24

 

No matter how successful and cosmopolitan he may experience himself to be, ultimately these self-images are nothing but figments of his narcissist imagination: in fact, he can only ever be an uninvited visitor (‘tourist’, ‘expat’), an obtrusive meddler (‘aid worker’, ‘humanitarian activist’), a money-grubbing opportunist (‘foreign investor’, ‘digital nomad’) or a vampiric parasite (asylum fraudster, people smuggler). Essentially, Homo Aeroporticus is Cain wandering the earth. Thus, by his very nature - which is to have no allegiance to anything but himself - Homo Aeroporticus constitutes a danger to any rooted community, necessarily relating to it as a risk in terms of interests and values. The ‘migrant communities’, which are often said to bring huge benefits to their homelands in terms of money remittances, family connections and business opportunities, constitute a clear and imminent danger to their country of residence as well as their country of origin: belonging to neither, they can be manipulated against both. Such manipulations, now easier to realize than in previous times due to the exponentially growing power of global surveillance (phone apps, geolocation, real-time tracking), can take many forms - mostly variants on the ‘three Bs’ of ‘intelligence industry’ personnel policy: Bribe, Blackmail and Bullet. The infiltration of ‘migrant’ and ‘expat’ communities, combining ‘career counselling’, lucrative contracts and entertainment opportunities with honey traps, family threats and intermittent violence, is particularly attractive for state actor or big business agents that are keen on subverting the homeland governments of these communities: citizens residing abroad are more difficult to monitor for these governments and they provide conduits for surveillance, blackmail and sabotage operations extending back into the homeland. In other words, the many ‘migrant’ and ‘expat’ communities from the Eurasian East and Global South residing in the West provide a perfect tool for the creation of a Fifth Column in their countries of origin.

The many Western-engineered and Western-sponsored ‘humanitarian interventions’, ‘colour revolutions’ and ‘popular uprisings’ that have plagued the Eurasian East and Global South over the last decades are in large part due to the pernicious role played by the greater and lesser ‘migrant’ communities from Asia, Africa and Latin America that Western governments set up in Western countries, actively encouraging ‘asylum seekers’, ‘family reunification’ and ‘investment opportunities’ and generously providing priority housing, social security benefits and selective preferments. The price for this ‘immigration policy’ - which is nothing but a policy of reverse colonization - is not only paid by the Western host nations, but also by the Eurasian and Global South origin nations of the  ‘migrant’ communities that were thus created. Not only in terms of the short-term ‘brain drain’ and ‘culture distortion’ effects that mass emigration created in the origin nations, but also in terms of a clear and imminent threat to the long-term security and stability of these nations. This is especially true in the case of those nations that still possess real state sovereignty and authentic national identity: these features, being incompatible with globalist-nihilist hegemony, make those nations prime targets for direct and indirect Western aggression. Almost all governments face dissidents on various issues of domestic policy, but in the case of state-sovereign nations currently opposing West-based globalist hegemony, such dissidents are excessively fêted and, where possible, ruthlessly used by Western governments in their campaign to overthrow any remaining form of state sovereignty in the Eurasian East and the Global South. Over the last decades, dissidents from non-Western-aligned countries living in the West, motivated opportunistically or otherwise, must have played a largely hidden but essential role in the infiltration, subversion and overthrow of their homeland governments. Spread across the West, hundreds of thousands of ‘migrants’ from all Global South countries are only too eager for an opportunity to enrich and avenge themselves at the expense of their original home countries in the service of the same globalist powers that allowed them to settle and thrive as privileged settlers within the reverse-colonized West. At the same time there are tens of thousands of trained and prepped fighters belonging to globalist-sponsored terror outfits such as Da^cesh, and MEK, that are kept in reserve in Western satellite countries such as Albania, Bosnia, Kosovo and Turkey, covered by ‘refugee’ status and subsidized through various NGOs, till such time that they are reactivated for some ‘covert operation’ or military campaign. From Libya and Sudan to Pakistan and Bangladesh, from Ukraine and Moldova to Syria and Lebanon, globalist ‘three Bs’-based infiltration strategy, utilizing large ‘migrant’ communities in the West, activated alongside NGO-engineered ‘colour revolution’ and West-backed ‘humanitarian intervention’, is likely to have played a major role in the overthrow of state-sovereign governments. Thus far, the overthrow of the Assad government in Syria represents the apogee of this combined strategy. It has signally failed in Russia and Belarus, where the liberal elite’s ‘expat’ component in the West is now recognized as a Trojan Horse.

The ultimate test case of the Western strategy of weaponizing ‘migrant’ communities against their home nation, however, is the ‘Friday the Thirteenth’ globalist-nihilist onslaught against Iran, continuing into its tenth day as these words are being written.[5] A large section of the millions-strong Iranian ‘expat’ population inhabiting the West, the younger cohorts of which are largely made up of opportunists (fake ‘refugees’ from ‘political persecution’, pretended ‘converts’ from ‘repressive’ theocracy), fraudsters (enjoying asylum status in the West but holidaying in Iran, collecting income support in the West but retaining home assets in Iran) and mercenaries (paid activists, intelligence assets), is eagerly supporting the overthrow of their home nation government. Like vultures, they circle a quarry they believe wounded, hoping that, after the supposedly inevitable overthrow of the ‘regime’, their Western sponsors will throw them some tasty scraps of the anticipated spoils: a cushy sinecure in a Quisling ministry, a lucrative contract in the bankster ‘privatization’ of the national wealth or a well-paid henchman position in Savak 2.0, allowing them to vent long pent-up resentments on humiliated enemies. Even as these words are being written, a large ‘50 Cent Army’ of Iranian-descent key-board warriors, safely ensconced in cosy nests around the West, is flooding the social media space with well paid-for and hasbarah-enhanced ‘posts’ and ‘tweets’, encouraging their compatriots back home to take to the streets and rise against the government. Invariably, the few of them that ever matched actions with words belong to the exile remnants of the various proxy outfits that the West has unsuccessfully launched against the Islamic Republic over the last four decades, joining the invading forces of Saddam Hussayn to fight their compatriots on the Iraq-Iran War front before resorting to terrorizing civilians in a sustained domestic campaign of bombing and assassination. Even fewer of them can claim to be true ‘dissidents’, lacking the capacity for autonomous discernment as well as the inclination to follow any path but that of the easiest material gain. These ‘exile Iranians’, who will return to their ‘Tehrangeles’ pool sides, their bank balance updates and their water melons once the headlines fade from their screens, even after hundreds of their compatriots were killed and maimed by Zionist drones and MEK bombs, are creatures below contempt.

There is no denying that there are Iranian individuals who found themselves exiled after the Islamic Revolution because of legitimate objections, well-founded grievances and irreconcilable differences - rightly or wrongly, they felt compelled to move elsewhere. There is, however, a clear line between dissent and treason. Irrespective of the domestic rights and wrongs addressed by individual dissenters and the real and imagined injustices they experienced at the hand of what they describe as the ‘regime’, the fact remains that the incumbent Iranian government, in its diplomatic and military guardianship of the border, represents the Iranian nation as an authentically sovereign state. In this regard, the situation of the Iranian state is entirely different than that of most Western states, most particularly the EU vassals of the US, which may plausibly claim they are US occupied territory rather than sovereign territory: whereas Iran has a national border, a national army, a national legal system, a national currency, a national banking system, a national currency and a national language, the EU states lack all these things. Thus, those Iranian ‘regime opponents’ who currently collaborate with the Zionist entity ( the ‘Lesser Satan’ behind which stands the ‘Greater Satan’ of the Anglosphere-based globalist hegemon), facilitating and cheering on its unprovoked war of aggression, aggravated by the cowardly surprise attack that started it and by the terrorist methods with which it is waged, have now put themselves beyond the pale. They have become traitors, supporting the world’s most accursed regime in an all-out, no-holds-barred attempt to utterly destroy their home nation. The historical role of this 21^st Century Iranian traitor class is far worse than that of the 20^th Century White Russian and Nationalist Chinese exiles: at the very least, the White Russian and Nationalist Chinese exiles possessed the redeeming feature of standing for outdated but authentic national identities and for old but authentic religious traditions - even if, at times, they chose the wrong allies to fight for them. Very few Iranian exiles, ‘asylum’ fraudsters and shallow materialists for the most part, can claim the same. But even in their mercenary calculation, these Iranian exiles overlook the lesson they should have learnt from those many other exile servants that served satano-globalism in the past, from Afghanistan to Russia: these were betrayed and discarded by their master as soon as they served their purpose and as soon as their designs failed.

Whether or not the satano-globalist ‘regime change’ operation in Iran will succeed remains to be seen: even as Operation Rising Lion and Operation Midnight Hammer exit their ‘15 minutes of fame’ and even as their dates enter history as ‘days of infamy’, blanket censorship still prevails, preventing an accurate assessment of their antidote, viz. Operation True Promise III - which imposed the same stranglehold of deadly attrition on Project Zion that Operation Z already imposed on Project Ukraine. But one thing is already certain: the Iranian traitors who supported and joined the satano-globalist strike on the Iranian nation will now never know any homeland. True to their status as Homo Aeroporticus, they will remain in limbo for as long as they live.

 

And now art thou cursed from the earth

which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand

When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength

A fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth

- Genesis 4:11-12

 

‘Midsommar’[6]

(Peak-Globalist Geopolitics)

 

What rough beast, its hour come round at last
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

- William Butler Yeats, ‘The Second Coming’

 

It is necessary for the political leaders of the Multipolarity Movement and the intellectual leaders of the Eurasian Movement, the latter relating to the former as idea relates to action, to remind themselves of what is geopolitically at stake in the current satano-globalist gambit in the Middle East. Although the Multipolarity Movement has some powerful outer bulwarks, including states like Cuba, Venezuela and Yemen, that stand against the satano-globalist tide in geographic isolation, its true citadel is consists of the tristate coalition that shields the Heartland: Russia, China and Iran - these three states represent the power core of the Multipolar Revolution that aims at the overthrow of satano-globalist hegemony seeking to maintain the Unipolar ‘New World Order’ at all costs. They are buttressed by a few allied and co-belligerent states, mainly those in their immediate periphery, such as Belarus, North Korea and Vietnam, but the global balance of power is predicated upon the ability of this tristate coalition to hold and stick together. United, they succeed – divided, they fall. Across the Global South and around the Eurasian periphery, states are hedging their bets until it becomes clear whether or not the Multipolar citadel can be breached: from Hungary and Serbia in the West, across the oil-rich Gulf monarchies and the nuclear-power South Asian states in the south, to Malaysia and Indonesia in the East, many states aspiring to full post-imperialist sovereignty are awaiting the outcome of the current satano-globalist onslaught against Iran. Can the Unipolar hegemon breach the Multipolar citadel, or will the anti-imperialist resistance foil the designs of the globalist hegemon? Indirectly but truly, the fate of the world now hangs in the balance as Iran, undoubtedly the weakest link in the tristate coalition defending the Eurasian Heartland, confronts the full might of the globalist hegemon, which is throwing against it all the resources of the mightiest empire known in recorded history and which, doing justice to its essential grounding in hubris and blasphemy, the author has elsewhere described as ‘Neo-Atlantis’.[7]

Having failed in its three-and-a-half year attempt to overthrow sovereign Russia through Project Ukraine, starting with its 2022 ‘shock and awe’ sanctions offensive, continuing with its 2023 ‘Fall Blau’ 2.0 summer offensive and 2024 ‘Operation Zitadelle 2.0’ Kursk offensive and culminating in its 2025 ‘Operation Spider’s Web’ Wunderwaffen offensive, the Anglosphere-based globalist elite has now launched an all-out attempt to overthrow sovereign Iran, delegating its first strike to its Zionist colony through with ‘Operation Rising Lion’. Synchronizing diplomatic distraction (the fake ‘Muscat negotiations’), narrative cover (the concocted ‘IAEA report’), sleeper cell activation (the ‘truck drone’ assassinations), digital sabotage ( ‘viral’ interdiction of communications and air defences) and nuclear blackmail (bombing nuclear facilities in direct contravention of what was once indisputable international law), the Zionist attack was characterized by a deadly combination of thoroughly prepared intelligence infiltration, state-of-the-art technical competence and utter disregard for what were once the rules of civilized warfare, rendering categories such as ‘civilian’ and ‘non-combatant’ as redundant in Iran as they have been in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen since ‘07/10’.[8] The most probable reason that this ‘decapitation strike’ seems to have gone awry, however, is that it failed in one crucial respect: it was most likely intended as an ‘incapacitation strike’, providing an opportunity for the supposed ‘resistance’ within Iran to overthrow the government through a combination of military mutinies and popular uprisings. This scenario is confirmed by well-timed and simultaneous public calls on the Iranian people to rise against their supposed ‘oppressors’ by the Zionist leadership, even speaking the Persian language and adopting Persian symbolism for the occasion, as well as the entire CIA-funded leadership coterie of the Iranian diaspora, including members of the former royal family. Given the self-evident inability of the Zionist entity, already military and economically overextended by nearly two years of large-scale violence on multiple fronts, to bring down the Iranian state by itself, this uprising must have been an essential element of globalist long-term strategic planning. The only way to legitimize the blatant aggression of ‘Operation Rising Lion’, which violated the most basic provisions of what was once the United Nations’ charter, and - more importantly - to stabilize Iran after the overthrow of the Islamic Republic would have been by the rapid installation of a replacement government that could claim at least a minimum of nationalist legitimacy and popular support. The commencement of Iran’s retaliatory ‘Operation True Promise III’, just hours later, essentially marked the failure of this scheme, reducing the effectiveness of the Zionist entity’s ‘Operation Rising Lion’ to that of the Empire of Japan’s ‘Operation AI’ in 1941, which only managed ‘to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve’. Blanket censorship of social media posts and visual news reports may still hide the utter devastation now daily inflicted on the great cities, critical infrastructure and military facilities of the Zionist entity from a global audience, but the reality of Iran’s short-term response is already evident on the ground - it remains to be seen whether or not it is matched by appropriately long-term resolve.

After increasing evidence of the limitations of the Zionist entity as the regional military asset of globalist hegemony (at least in any operation other than terrorizing civilian populations and intimidating non-compliant governments by the mass application of disproportionate and indiscriminate violence), the only viable strategy to ‘take down’ Iran was direct American military involvement, as happened with the ‘nuclear site’ strike of Midsummer, 2025. Of course, America has already been providing the funds, weapons, munitions, logistics, training and intelligence necessary to keep their Ukrainian and Zionist proxies in the fight for many months, even if its status as the West’s famed ‘arsenal of democracy’ has been considerably degraded both in terms of military industrial capacity and of narrative credibility as ‘democracy’ has been domestically reduced to a paper-thin façade, now barely covering full-blown techno-totalitarianism under the aegis of FAANG rule and Palantir surveillance. The shift from indirect American-sponsored proxy wars to direct American military action, however, does point to a crucial shift in the global power balance in two distinct ways:

(1) First, America’s direct military involvement, necessitated by the relative weakness of one of its regional proxy projects, is indirect evidence of the increasing weakness of the globalist hegemonic system overall. Overtaken by the geopolitical reality of ‘imperial overreach’, that system is now becoming both kinetically and psychologically unhinged, showing its outer limits as well as its inner fractures. Thus, ideally, the American administration should have weighed the short-term political benefit of placating the lunatic fringe of the Neo-Con donor class (a.k.a. the ‘Israel Lobby’) at home against the long-term political sustainability of its empire abroad. By not doing so and by resorting to the most sordid methods of subterfuge and deceit to deliver a cowardly stab in the back to Iran at the very moment when it was fighting for its survival as a sovereign nation-state, America has now irretrievably lost the last shreds of the great moral status, diplomatic prestige and military reputation with which it exited WWII in 1945 and which allowed it to establish its Unipolar hegemony in 1991. In June 2025, the US found itself in a ‘now or never’ moment that is, in some ways, not dissimilar to that which Italy found itself in in June 1940: it had a choice to join the war of its most obvious ally and it could hope to deliver a decisive blow to its most obvious enemy, at the very moment that this enemy seemed weakened, but only at the risk of ultimately finding itself on the loosing side of a much larger global conflict of which the outcome remained uncertain. America’s ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’ of Midsummer 2025 represents not only America’s ‘hyena moment’ but also its ‘rubicon moment’: the short-lived ‘Trump moment’, which (in theory at least) offered America a last ‘window of opportunity’ to exit satano-globalism and redefine itself as one great power between equals, has now irretrievably passed and America has now staked all on a desperate Flucht nach Vorn gamble. It has now no choice but to ‘go all the way’ and walk its chosen path of pyro-politics and necro-politics to the very end.

 

For in the hand of the Lord there is a cup and the wine is red

It is full of mixture and He poureth out of the same

But the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out and drink them

- Psalm 75:8

 

(2) Second, America’s reckless squandering of its entire ‘soft power’ inheritance, destroying its moral beacon status as the ‘land of the free’, its diplomatic prestige as the creator and guarantor of the world’s ‘rules-based order’ and its military reputation as the ‘home of the brave’ and ‘arsenal of democracy’, has now exposed the post-WWII order of ‘global governance’ (with the UNSC and the IAEA now joining the UNHCR and the WHO in the dustbin of history) as well as the post-Cold War globalist narrative of the ‘New World Order’ (‘international justice’, ‘free trade’, ‘development goals’, ‘open borders’) as naïve fictions at best and deliberate deceptions at worst. The shameless deceit of the ‘Muscat talks’, the transparent recycling of the ‘WMD’ narrative used in the Iraq War and the reckless bombing of nuclear facilities in direct contravention of explicit international commitments all point to a deliberate shift away from the old ‘soft power’ approach: deliberate perfidy is now standard policy. The utter bankruptcy of American ‘soft power’ has eliminated the mask of satano-globalist hegemony: it has eliminated decades old institutional and narrative smokescreens to reveal the true power behind the globalist throne, viz. the clinically insane ‘hostile elite’ ruling the West, made up of high finance banksters, megalomaniac billionaires, transhumanist ideologues and antinomian cult leaders. Elsewhere, the author has exposed the heretical antecedents and anti-human aims of this dark force - these explain the irrational and obsessive manner in which the satano-globalist rulers cling to their Neo-Zion and Neo-Khazaria projects, which function as ‘Tower of Satan’ counterweights to the World Katechon redoubts of Russia’s rising Third Rome and the Fertile Crescent’s occupied Holy Land. Here, it suffices to say that the exposure of satano-globalist rule in America, previously disguised as Obama Era ‘affirmative action’ kakistocracy, Biden Era ‘deep state’ oligarchy and Trump Moment ‘MAGA’ caesarism, augurs in a new era in international relations. The satano-globalist Great Reset, first rolled out domestically across the West through the Covid scamdemic, the BLM psy-op, the Biden coup and the Vaccinocaust between early 2020 and mid-2022, has now completed its second stage of international proxy wars, fought in Ukraine and the Levant between early 2022 and mid-2025. The Great Reset is now entering its third stage, starting with a direct assault on the Heartland citadel of the Multipolarity Movement that likely ‘shapes the battlefield’ for a final, all-out satano-globalist Griff nach der Weltmacht. Perhaps, the satano-globalist rulers were prompted to enter this third stage prematurely, triggered by the unexpectedly early defeat of the Zionist Snake by the Persian Lion. Perhaps, they overreached and will be forced to retrace their steps and regroup. Perhaps, the ad hoc anti-globalist coalition, cobbled together of reluctant states and non-state actors and reacting on an impromptu basis, will once again fail to grasp the greater overall predicament, once again fail to cohere in the face of common danger and, once again, waste precious time. But whatever may be the outcome of the satano-globalists’ 2025 Midsummer gambit (if the four decades of similar gambits are anything to go by: stalemate), one thing is sure: peak-globalism is upon the world and a gateway view to final globalist victory, over all that is still high, good and beautiful in the world, has opened up.

 

Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate

 

‘The Night Window’[9]

(Satano-Globalist Prospects)

 

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face. For ever

- George Orwell, 1984

 

Having digested the geopolitical reality of peak-globalism, it is now also necessary for the political leaders of the Multipolarity Movement and the intellectual leaders of the Eurasian Movement to take a long, hard look at the prospect of satano-globalist victory. A thorough study of the worst-case scenario is not a luxury: without a correct assessment of enemy strategy, the successful exorcism of enemy power is impossible. After the geopolitical stakes, the existential stakes behind the current satano-globalist gambit in the Middle East must be properly understood before they can be successfully countered. Elsewhere, the author has extensively covered the aetiology of the satano-globalist elite and its eschatological vision,[10]  understanding of which is more important for the understanding of current geopolitical developments than macro-economic number crunching and military strength calculus. Here, it must suffice to point to two terms useful for the understanding of global power patterns, viz. the ongoing and accelerating process of Zionization and Israelization, most advanced in the Western heartland but now also rapidly spreading elsewhere. (1) First, Zionization covers the cultic distortion of the ‘mainstream’ political and media narrative to achieve the de facto induction of the masses into a permanent, trance-like state of cultic possession (‘mass formation’, ‘zombie apocalypse’), characterized by quasi-millenarian fanaticism and exploitable by the ruling hostile elite for whatever ‘cause’ it needs support for at any particular moment, irrespective of the objective self-interest of the possessed subject himself. (2) Second, Israelization, covers the technical, bureaucratic and legal implementation of techno-totalitarian state control, using of ubiquitous surveillance, automatized information control and AI-enhanced behaviour modification, to achieve the maximum prevention and rapid neutering (‘cancellation’, ‘deplatforming’, ‘debanking’) of any (incipient) form of dissident information or activity, preferably in real time. A common feature of both processes is their utter disregard for any form of ethics: they may be defined as intrinsically unethical, lacking even the most basic features of sportsmanship and martial honour. The ultimate aim of these two complementary processes, of which the former primarily targets societal superstructure and the latter primarily targets societal infrastructure, is to first stabilize and then expand satano-globalist hegemony, first within the West and then across the Rest.

Stabilization thus achieved - effectively the political equivalent of lobotomization - would permit the Western financial system to simply ‘skip’, through CBDC and other ‘crypto’ mechanisms, its otherwise inevitable collapse, attendant on what could be termed the ‘ultimate crisis of capitalism’ in Marxist terms. It would also allow satano-globalism to implement its seemingly outlandish transhumanist goals on a mass scale in a relatively smooth fashion, with total perception control paving the way to a gradual, but ultimately infinite ‘adjustment’ of reality itself. If inconvenient historical facts can be readjusted at a whim (‘digital archives’) and if inconvenient truths, opinions and actions can be ‘disappeared’ rapidly enough (‘digital media’), then the lived reality of the masses, already unmoored from cultural transmission and societal atomization, will become extremely ‘fluid’, i.e. malleable and exploitable by the ruling hostile elite. The technological malleability of human biology itself, including ‘gene editing’ and ‘hybridization’, is the next logical step, as already evidenced by the mass acceptance of ‘transgender’ surgeries and mRNA ‘vaccinations’ throughout the West. Already, a distinctive ‘zombie’-like atmosphere is pervading the Western public space, with silent, glassy-eyed consumer masses, glued to their screens and insensible to their own torn clothing and to the presence of passers-by, shuffling to where they are directed by the prompts of largely fictitious ‘work’, mostly artificial ‘fashion’ and increasingly online ‘relationships’. Already, distinctive ‘ork’-like personality changes are visible in the Western masses, with the increasing prevalence of gross body disfigurements (tattoos, piercings), cultic body signalling (blue hair for liberal politics, botox looks for financial status) and rapid mood changes (spike protein-induced frontal lobe damage, cell phone-induced attention span deficit). These same phenomena are also observable in the more ‘westernized’ population segments of the Eurasian East and the Global South, particularly in their ‘liberal elites’, whose comprador bourgeois interests and cosmopolitan life-styles render them vulnerable to Western doctrines and propaganda and which politically represent a permanent ‘fifth column’ danger within society, amplified by their financial ties and network contacts abroad. Even more particularly they are visible in their Homo Aeroporticus ‘expat’ populations settled in the West, which, already ‘hybrid’ in terms of allegiance and interest, tend to derive their status from their residence in and association with the West. To the extent that they take on roles in politics, academia and the media, such Homo Aeroporticus types show a remarkable tendency to be more militantly secular and more subversively anti-traditional than most of their native Western peers. Prominent examples in the Netherlands, to use the author’s homeland to illustrate the point, include Iranian professional ‘Islam critic’ Afshin Ellian and Somali professional ‘Islam apostate’ Hirsi Ali.[11] They truly function as ‘Trojan Horses’ in relation to their original homelands, with the downfall of their nation masked by smooth words. Unfortunately, many of their compatriots, suffering from terminal gharbzadegi, heed their fork-tongued speech, even if the bombed-out cities and orphaned children of their homelands speak volumes to the contrary:

 

Already have We urged unto hell many of the jinn and humankind

having hearts wherewith they understand not

and having eyes wherewith they see not

and having ears wherewith they hear not

These are as the cattle - nay, but they are worse

These are the neglectful

- Quran 7:179

 

Effectively, the neglectful population element of the Eurasian East and the Global South have become part of what Renaud Camus has aptly termed the Undifferentiated Human Matter (UHM) that Modern Western ‘replacism’ has created: faux, simili, imitation, ersatz, simulacrum, copies, counterfeiting, fakes, forgeries, lures, mimics, are [its] key words…[12] As the author has argued elsewhere, this UHM is essentially irredeemable due to the spiritual capitulation that preceded its social degradation and political perversion. Or, in the words of a famous follower of what Persians term the Javidan Kherad, usually accessed by Europeans through the Traditionalist School:

The outlook that governs modern civilization and that characterizes anyone who can be described as ‘a typical product of the [present] century’ may be considered a ‘sign of the times’ in that it represents no less that man’s capitulation to his archenemy - a capitulation that is all the more total for being unconscious. That is indeed the crux of the matter, for instead of being bent on revenge, the loser has finally been induced to believe that he has suffered no loss whatsoever [and] that his enemy is nonexistent... So total a defeat would have seemed impossible, even in a relatively near past. - Martin Lings

Capitulation to the currently ongoing satano-globalist programs of Zionization and Israelization means capitulation to humanity’s archenemy. For his comrades and colleagues in the Lord-of-the-Rings-prone Dissident Right, the author here may add: capitulation means that Sauron won.

 

The way of Gaza will be the way of the world

- Max Igan[13]

 

Hecate Apotropaia

(Xenopolitical Imperatives)

 

The symbolic aspects of the all-out satano-globalist onslaught against the Islamic Republic of Iran are clear for all to see, signalling the cultic allegiance and magical intent of its perpetrators: responsible statesmanship and realpolitik analysis require an effort to understand these cultic and magical aspects because they point to the enemy’s motivation and aim. ‘Rising Lion’ reared its head on Friday the Thirteenth, and the intended image was a palimpsest, viz. the Lion of Judah projected on the Lion and Sun of the Persian Empire. ‘Midnight Hammer’ fell hard on the heels of Midsummer 2025, with the 22 June date made to coincide with the start of that other surprise attack meant to bring down another ‘Axis of Evil’ empire: Operation Barbarossa. ‘Rising Lion’ also refers to Holy Scripture (Numbers 23:24), where the image is used in words spoken by a Gentile prophet referring to the then nation of (authentic) Israel - apparently, the Zionist planners of the strike on Iran wished to emphasize their claim to represent ‘reborn Israel’ in the (counterfeit) Zionist state.[14] Countering the Zionists’ surprise attack and opposing their fraudulent claim, the Islamic Republic of Iran then launched ‘True Promise III’, which refers to a Quranic admonition (17:34) addressed to the Sons of Israel, reminding them of the duties incumbent on them under their covenant with God.

These symbolic references, and some other, more specific ‘codes’ hidden in plain sight, point to the undeniable eschatological aspect of the struggle between the Neo-Zion project and the Axis of Resistance, an aspect that is increasingly growing in importance as statecraft rationality (state borders, military equations) and the resource calculus (oil resources, water access) fade into the background and as its ‘clash of civilizations’ and ‘worldview warfare’ aspects take centre stage. The more the eschatological fault line between satano-globalist hegemony and anti-globalist resistance aligns with the ethno-religious fault line between the wannabe ‘Jewish state’ and the real-world Middle East, the more irrelevant statecraft rationality and resource calculus become, to the point of rendering diplomatic rationality and negotiation logic irrelevant. This shift does not surprise anybody familiar with the history of this region: the Fertile Crescent and its hinterland are the location of the world’s oldest historically recorded cultures and empires, where even the ancient Abrahamic religions are relative newcomers and where many remnant religions, relic languages and empire legacies still endure, with much of their origins either lost, obscured or hidden. In this setting, many known and unknown archetypes, embedded in ancient capital letter Traditions, some entirely incompatible, wield true power over people’s lives. At the centre of the current ‘forever wars’ unleashed by the Anglosphere-based satano-globalist hegemon is the Holy Land, where these incompatibilities are most accentuated. To understand the ‘eschatological shift’ in the struggle between the Neo-Zion project and the Axis of Resistance, the political leaders of the Multipolarity Movement and the intellectual leaders of the Eurasian Movement would do well to study its psycho-historical, cultic and symbolic aspects - and to identify apotropaic formulas rather than political solutions.

This need to apply apotropaic formulas in what is a supposedly realpolitik setting, such as that of the current ‘Middle East conflict’, may be illustrated by the case in which a patient can benefit more from an exorcism ritual than from a medical procedure. In this respect, the Eurasian Movement has a distinct advantage in its intellectual and worldview affinity with the Traditionalist School: Traditionalist teachings give a prominent place to analyses of precisely the symbols and rituals that are - consciously or unconsciously, hiddenly or openly - important to the warring parties in that conflict. As noted by Professor Dugin, the leading light of the Eurasian Movement,[15] any key symbols and rituals in authentic Traditions refer to the spectral but powerful archetype of the ‘Guardian of the Threshold’, i.e. the forcefield that guards boundaries at all levels, from individual privacy in the personal life (religious practice, family life, gender relations) to the rights of states and nations in international relations.[16] The ‘Guardian of the Threshold’, which appears in different ‘avatar’ shapes depending on the situation (scale, time, place), acts as a segregator as well as a protector in situations of liminality, i.e. at the point where private and public spheres border, interact and clash. Perhaps the best-known, and certainly most classical appearance of the ‘Guardian of the Threshold’ in the European Tradition is Hecate Apotropaia, which also happens to be the daughter of Perses (Persia Personified) and the grand-daughter of Phoebe (Fear Personified): she is the protectress of liminal spaces par excellence, associated with awesome powers of retribution against those that transgress divine ordinances. Remembering this ancient ‘avatar’ of the ‘Guardian of the Threshold’ (female as befitting the Tradition of Europe, the only continent bearing the name of an individual female) will serve the leaders and thinkers of the Eurasian East and Global South as they seek to protect their borders from the boundary-crossing aggression and border-less insolence of the satano-globalist West: it will remind them of their sacred duty to protect their borders and to enforce stringent xenopolitical measures to eliminate hostile alien influences.

Whenever they can, the foreign policy decision-makers of the Eurasian East and Global South should implement common measures to combat common threats: united, they stand – divided, they fall. They should seriously consider coming together in a New Holy League, pledging to unite in the common cause of combating and eradicating satano-globalist subversion from their nations. They may opt not to destroy but quarantine the satano-globalist West, but they should realize that this is only feasible at the price of eternal vigilance.

The first xenopolitical imperative of such a New Holy League will be to end cross-border infiltration and subversion by systematically eliminating, through strict citizenship, residence and travel legislation, the danger posed by their own border-straddling ‘diaspora’ populations. This requires nothing less than the scrupulous supervision, strict isolation and surgical excision of Homo Aeroporticus-type ‘diaspora’ individuals, denying them any influence in the life of their original homeland - until this vampiric species, brought into the light it fears and starved of the blood it seeks, dies out from natural causes. Like a pest, this species can only thrive in the special conditions created by the satano-globalist ‘New World Order’ of the Unipolar Moment: it will wither and expire when these conditions end. Till that time, only a New Holy League-equivalent strategy, coordinated across the Eurasian East and the Global South and strictly enforced vis-à-vis the globalist-ruled West, will suffice to combat its pernicious effects. If the still-sovereign states of the Eurasian East and the Global South wish to avoid the fate of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, Libya, Sudan and Syria, and if they wish to avoid the ordeal of Palestine and Iran, which are facing domestic traitors working side by side with foreign aggressors, they have no choice but to learn this lesson. Before the Fire of Victory can devour the enemy who seeks to breach the wall, it must devour the traitor who seeks to open the gate.

 

Epilogue: The Fire of Victory

(Numino-Political Coda)

 

There is one certain means by which I can be sure never to see my country’s ruin:

I will die in the last ditch

- William III, Prince of Orange, Stadtholder of the Netherlands,

King of England, Scotland and Ireland

 

The substance of this essay addressed the theme of cowardly treason, but its final words must shift to its antidote: courageous faithfulness.

To face the enemy without and the traitor within at this critical juncture, the Eurasian East and Global South, with the Multipolarity Movement and the Eurasian Movement leading the charge, need steely-eyed confidence and death-defying determination. They are now caught up in one single struggle against satano-globalism, whether they wish it or not. They will need all the courage they can summon. They need to carry the purifying flame of the Atash-e Behram, the Fire of Victory,[17] which lives in the inner sanctum of the heart, out into the open and burn away the enemy.

The fiery stance of the Iran-led Axis of Resistance, not least inspired by the heroic deaths of Imam Ali at Kufa and Imam Husseyn at Karbala, lights up the path ahead. Somebody dedicated the following words to the memory of one of its heroes, Yahya Sinwar, when he joined the ranks of the countless martyrs of Gaza in the afternoon of 16  October 2024 - may they inspire the Fire of Victory in those defending all that is still high, good and beautiful in world, as they step up to confront the forces of darkness:

Oh my legs, in these final moments of life, preserve my dignity! You have served me for many long years, and I ask you to fulfil your duty in this last moment as best as you can. Oh my legs, be swift and strong! Oh my hands, be powerful and precise! Oh my eyes, be sharp and alert! Oh my heart, endure these last moments! Oh my soul, do not leave me weak and powerless! Just a few moments more, be strong and patient with willpower. I promise you that in just a few moments, you will find deep and eternal rest, and you will receive the compensation for this tiring life and these heavy moments. In just a few moments, you will achieve peace, eternal peace. I will no longer burden you. I will no longer exploit you day and night. I will no longer impose the pressures of the world and the tortures of life upon you. I will no longer deprive you of sleep and you will no longer cry out from exhaustion. You will not lament from pain and suffering, nor complain from hunger, heat or cold. You will rest forever in the soft bed of the earth, tranquil and at ease. But these sensitive moments, the moments of farewell to life and the world, the moments of meeting the Creator, the moments of my dance before death must be beautiful. - Chamran Mostafa Chamran Save’ei

 

Notes

Note that the author’s essays and podcasts can now be found on his Substack webpage, SUBSTACK.COM/@ALEXANDERWOLFHEZE. These, as well as his books and an oeuvre overview, can now also be accessed through his personal website, WHEREWOLF.EU.